Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

210 F.2d 654

Docket No. 11970.

Kavanagh v. Hershman

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1954-02-17

2 counsel of record

Relies on Mutch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1954-02-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1995

1 district · 1 state decisions

2019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Frank A. Picard, Judge.

H. Brian Holland, Ellis N. Slack, Loring W. Post, Washington, D.C., Fred W. Kaess, Roger P. O'Connor and Richard M. Roberts, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Levin, Levin, Garvett & Dill, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;

¶2

On consideration whereof it is ordered that the judgment of the United States District Court be and it hereby is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the District Court. See also Mutch v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 209 F.2d 390.

/210/f2d/654 · .json · Public domain