Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 F.2d 86 - Loew's, Inc. v. Cinema Amusements, Inc.

Loew's, Inc. v. Cinema Amusements, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

210 F.2d 86 · 1954

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
3
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently February 2007 · most notably Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. (1990), Admiral Theatre Corporation v. Douglas Theatre Company Jsb (1978)

54 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

230195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 16 (§ 5 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)

Relies on Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. · Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co. · Lavender v. Kurn · United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. · Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he measure of damages to which plaintiff is entitled in a case [arising under 15 U.S.C. § 15 ] is the pecuniary loss to its business or property resulting proximately from the combination or conspiracy of the defendants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “are not rendered speculative or conjectural merely because they cannot be calculated with mathematical exactness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.