Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 F.3d 1237 - Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

210 F.3d 1237 · 2000

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Tyler v. Union Oil Company of California (2002), Scully v. US WATS, Inc. (2001)

11 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

310200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Arizona v. California · McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. E Schleier B · Commissioner v. LoBue · White v. Murtha

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under that standard, we will affirm unless the instructions were `patently, plainly erroneous and prejudicial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * In any action brought to enforce this chapter the court shall have jurisdiction to grant such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this chapter, including without limitation judgments compelling employment, reinstatement or promotion, or enforcing the liability for amounts deemed to be unpaid minimum wages or unpaid overtime compensation under this section. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The conferring of options on an executive creates an incentive for the executive to work hard to increase the market price of the employer’s stock because that increases the value of the executive’s stock options. Stock options are an increasingly common form of executive compensation. Options are often conferred in the place of more traditional forms of compensation like salary....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.