Bishop v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
210 F.3d 1295 · 2000
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Antonelli v. Warden, U.S.P. Atlanta (2008), Fogade Fondo v. Enb Revocable Trust (2001)
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3244 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 18 U.S.C. § 4100 · 18 U.S.C. § 4102 · 18 U.S.C. § 4105 · 18 U.S.C. § 4106A · 18 U.S.C. § 4108 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Burks v. United States · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Jones v. Cunningham · Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ubject matter jurisdiction of the district court is a legal question that we review de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“1. In the case of continued enforcement, the administering State shall be bound by the legal nature and duration of the sentence as determined by the sentencing State. 2. If, however, this sentence is by its nature or duration incompatible with the law of the administering State, or its law so requires, that State may, by a court or administrative order, adapt the sanction to the punishment or measure prescribed by its own law for a similar offense. As to its nature, the punishment or measure shall, as far as possible, correspond with that imposed by the sentence to be enforced. It shall not aggravate, by its nature or duration, the sanction imposed in the sentencing State, nor exceed the maximum prescribed by the law of the administering State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Procedural legislation which makes operation of a Treaty more convenient cannot amend or abrogate a self-executing Treaty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.