Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 F.3d 776 - Rager v. Dade Behring, Inc.

Rager v. Dade Behring, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

210 F.3d 776 · 2000

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (§ 102 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2613 (§ 103 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993)

Relies on Smith-Haynie v. District of Columbia · Santa Maria v. Pacific Bell · Hentosh v. Herman M. Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School · Taliani v. Chrans · Katherine Thorson v. Gemini Inc Equal Employment Advisory Council

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rager argues that the 15 day period of notice to which the Act entitled her began to run... when she received the `Certification of Health Provider’ form.... The company argues that the 15 day period began when Rager requested family leave on December 19.... Neither is correct. Remember that the Act does not require the employer to request medical documentation on a particular form. All that is required is that the employee be informed in writing that he or she has 15 days in which to submit proof of a serious health condition, and of the consequences if it is not submitted within the deadline, which in this case was termination because in the absence of an entitlement under the Family and Medical Leave Act the plaintiff had no excuse for being absent from work”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No doubt, however, like most other limitations periods, the 15 day deadline for submitting medical documentation ... can be tolled, for example by conduct by the employer that is deemed to equitably estop him to plead the expiration of the deadline as a defense to liability under the Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “at least 15 calendar days in which to submit it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.