Scott v. Aetna Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 19 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 216
Relies on Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Marisol v. Giuliani · Mooney v. Aramco Services Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[C]lass members may fear reprisal and would not be inclined to pursue individual claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.