Krim v. pcOrder.com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77K (§ 11 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Gustafson v. Alloyd Co. · Castano v. American Tobacco Co. · Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District · Joseph v. Wiles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Lead Plaintiffs must demonstrate all stock for which they claim damages was actually issued pursuant to a defective statement, not just that it might have been, probably was, or most likely was, issued pursuant to a defective statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[o]therwise, `all persons who held stock in street name on and after the offering date could claim a proportional interest in the shares.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“language suggests a much broader class of potential plaintiffs than those who literally purchased their shares in the challenged offering.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.