Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 FSUPP 706 - MacE v. Jung

MacE v. Jung’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
10
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2000

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions — followed in 10 states

10019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad · Woods v. Lancet · Smith v. Brennan · Verkennes v. Corniea · Dietrich v. Inhabitants of Northampton

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.