Hernandez v. Stringer’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 253
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. · Corning Glass Works v. Brennan · Brooklyn Sav Bank v. O'Neil Dize
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Court cannot make credibility determinations regarding the parties' respective evidence on a motion for summary judgment, and for that reason the issue of the number of hours of work [the] plaintiff actually performed may ultimately be one for a jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reflects a reasonable compromise over issues that are actually in dispute , since merely waiving a right to wages owed is disallowed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.