Rhodes v. MCIC, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Relies on Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Boyle v. United Technologies Corp. · Willingham v. Morgan · Mesa v. California · Jefferson County v. Acker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant need not prove his entitlement to the defense in order to remove the case to federal court; he need only make a plausible showing of it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Cases dwelling on the exactness of 'proof' or 'evidence' to support the defense are not persuasive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.