Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Ga. App. 10 - Roberts v. Lane

210 Ga. App. 10 - Roberts v. Lane’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2010

6 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rothstein v. Golf Club Co. · 185 Ga. App. 304 - First Federal Savings Bank v. Hart · 64 Ga. App. 139 - Brandon v. Arkansas Fuel-Oil Co. · Hubacher v. Volkswagen Central, Inc. · Pavlovski v. Thornton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[publication is indispensable to recovery for libel or slander. (Cits.) A defamatory matter is published as soon as it is communicated to any person other than the impugned party. (Cits.)” Roberts v. Lane, 210 Ga. App. 10, 11 (1) ( 435 SE2d 227 ) (1993); [cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.