Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Ga. App. 421 - Deckard v. State

210 Ga. App. 421 - Deckard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2019

24 state decisions

90199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnston · 204 Ga. App. 214 - Beasley v. State · 184 Ga. App. 282 - Whittington v. State · 176 Ga. App. 145 - Turrentine v. State · 178 Ga. App. 83 - Sorrow v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Although we find no suggestion that the [deputy] intentionally misinformed [Wallace] concerning the penalty for refusal,... we cannot conclude that his misstatement of the law did not induce the consent. It directly impacted [Wallace’s] options under the Implied Consent Statute. 15”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where the consent was based at least in part on deceptively misleading information concerning a penalty for refusal which the state was not authorized to implement, there was no informed choice and the test results are inadmissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “misleading information concerning a penalty for refusal, ... [Stroud] was deprived of making an informed choice under the Implied Consent Statute. Accordingly, the [refusal was] rendered inadmissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.