Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

210 Ill. App. 399

Bush v. Carloading & Distributing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 29, 1918

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1918-04-29

<p>Abstract of the Decision.</p> <p>1. Payment, § 41*—when rule preventing recovery of money paid voluntarily under mistake of law is inapplicable. The rule which prevents the recovery of money voluntarily paid under a mistake as to the law and under a claim of right does not apply to an action by a carrier to recover freight charges refunded by it on interstate shipments under a mistake as to amount of such charges as regulated by the Interstate Commerce Act.</p> <p>2. Carribes, § 33a*—what rates must be paid on interstate shipments. The only rates which a common carrier may collect and a __ shipper may pay on interstate shipments are those fixed hy the Interstate Commerce Act, and those rates cannot be altered by mistakes or misapprehensions of either shipper or carrier.</p> <p>3. Commerce, § 33a*—what is proper forum to pass upon railroad rates and tariffs. The Interstate Commerce Commission is the proper forum to pass upon the comparative fairness of through rates and local tariffs.</p> <p>4. Carriers, § 211*—when expert evidence relating to interstate commerce tariff rates is admissible. In an action to recover back money alleged to have been erroneously refunded as an overcharge on an interstate shipment, it is not error to permit an expert to explain matters connected with the interstate commerce tariff rates and schedules.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1933

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1918-04-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice McSurely

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Commerce, § 33a*—what is proper forum to pass upon railroad rates and tariffs. The Interstate Commerce Commission is the proper forum to pass upon the comparative fairness of through rates and local tariffs.4. Carriers, § 211*—when expert evidence relating to interstate commerce tariff rates is admissible. In an action to recover back money alleged to have been erroneously refunded as an overcharge on an interstate shipment, it is not error to permit an expert to explain matters connected with the interstate commerce tariff rates and schedules.
/210/illapp/399 · .json · Public domain