210 Ill. App. 3d 1059 - People v. Joyce’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · 106 Ill. 2d 237 - People v. Collins · 76 Ill. 2d 289 - People v. Taylor · 131 Ill. 2d 91 - People v. Hester · Morrison v. Flowers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Prima facie evidence means such evidence as is sufficient to establish a given fact. *** * * * The attempted luring of a child under the age of sixteen into a motor vehicle without the consent of the parent may be prima facie evidence of other than a lawful purpose. You are never required to find prima facie evidence. In determining whether or not the defendant’s purpose was other than lawful, you may take into consideration any other evidence presented in the case.” (Emphasis added.) Joyce I, 210 Ill. App. 3d at 1069 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““A person commits the offense of child abduction when he intentionally attempts to lure a child under the age of sixteen into a motor vehicle, for other than a lawful purpose, without the consent of the parent of the child. The attempted luring of a child under the age of sixteen into a motor vehicle without the consent of the parent of the child may be considered evidence of other than a lawful purpose.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the indictment that the supreme court approved in Williams was no more specific than the one here. We therefore find that the defendant was sufficiently apprised of both the nature and the elements of the offense. See Williams, 133 Ill.2d at 454 [ 141 Ill.Dec. 444 , 551 N.E.2d 631 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.