210 Ill. App. 3d 573 - People v. Bosek’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2016
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 104 Ill. 2d 504 - People v. Albanese · 123 Ill. 2d 184 - People v. Reddick · 91 Ill. 2d 536 - People v. Huckstead
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) His federal constitutional rights to due process of law and trial by jury were violated when the trial court failed to instruct the jury as to the presumption of innocence and the requirement that the State prove the petitioner guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of second degree murder; (Petition, pp. 4-5.) (2) His conviction, despite the State’s failure to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, denied the petitioner his federal constitutional right to due process; (Petition, pp. 5-6.) (3) His rights to due process and a fair trial were violated when the court refused the petitioner’s requested instruction that the jury may consider evidence of the victim’s aggressive and violent character, along with the other facts and circumstances, to show who was the aggressor; (Petition, pp. 6-7.) (4) His right to due process was violated by the State’s presentation into evidence of alleged prior violent conduct of the petitioner in allegedly beating his son seven years earlier; (Petition, p. 8.) (5) His rights to due process and effective assistance of counsel were violated by the conduct of his attorney during trial. (Petition, p. 8)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.