Brizendine v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2008 · most notably State v. Ortiz (1982), State v. Phinney (2005)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Dickey v. Florida · Atilus v. United States · Kent v. United States · Benoit v. Wingo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There are a number of federal cases involving similar factual situations where an accused was denied effective assistance of counsel thereby resulting in the denial of an appeal from a conviction. In each case the court held that an outright discharge of the prisoner was not proper but rather he was entitled to an opportunity to take an out-of-time appeal from his original conviction. (Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 , 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 ; Atilus v. United States, 406 F. 2d 694 , Benoit v. Wingo, 423 F. 2d 880 ; Kent v. United States, 423 F. 2d 1050 .) We find nothing to the contrary in Dickey v. Florida, 398 U. S. 30 , 26 L. Ed. 2d 26 , 90 S. Ct. 1564 . . . .’’(l. c.244.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.