Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Kan. 288 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently October 2007 · most notably State v. Nunn (1989), State v. Bly (1974)

58 state decisions

3801972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group · General Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · State v. King · State v. Fleury · State v. McDermott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . It is firmly established in this jurisdiction that reversible error cannot be predicated upon a complaint of misconduct of counsel in closing argument to the jury where no objection is lodged. (State v. Fleury, 203 Kan. 888 , 457 P. 2d 44 ; and State v. McDermott, 202 Kan. 399 , 449 P. 2d 545 , cert. den. 396 U. S. 912 , 24 L. Ed. 2d 187 , 90 S. Ct. 226 .)” (p. 297.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““. . . Where one or more of the elements or incidents of an offense numerated as exceptions under K. S. A. 60-455 is an issue in the case, we have repeatedly held that the similarity of the two offenses makes the previous conviction relevant. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.