Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Kan. 842 - State v. Sullivan & Smith

State v. Sullivan & Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
January 1999
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 1999 · most notably State v. Cameron & Bentley (1975), Mildfelt v. Lair (1977)

34 state decisions

260197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Leigh · State v. Jones · State v. Omo · State v. Knowles · State v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . K. S. A. 1971 Supp. 22-3212 (7) gives the court several options when the prosecuting attorney has not complied with its discovery order. The court may order the offending party to permit the discovery or inspection of materials not previously disclosed, may grant a continuance, or refuse to admit the undisclosed material in evidence, or it may make such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.” (p. 847.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Hollaway
  2. ““We cannot refrain from re-emphasizing, however, that a discovery order entered by the court is not to be taken lightly by a member of the bar. Once an order has been made directing discovery, counsel has a continuing obligation to see that its terms are carried out in utmost good faith.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Davis

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.