Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Md. 301 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

2 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2006

2 district · 22 state decisions

60195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gaither v. Cate · Polansky v. State · Hunter v. State · Wolf v. State · People v. One Pinball Machine Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““include[d] any ‘device(s) * * * at which money * * * shall be bet or wagered.’ Construing the statutes liberally, we see no reason to confíne the application of the statute to those devices that depend upon chance, as distinguished from skill. In its broader aspects, ‘playing any game for money is gaming.’ Ankers v. Bartlett, 1 K.B. 147 [1936].’ ” Brown v. State, supra, 210 Md. at 307 , 123 A.2d at 327 . (asterisks in original, emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It may be inferred, despite the paucity of evidence as to how the machine worked, that the inducement to play was, in part at least, the chance of gain. The insertion of the money and the operation of the device by the player in the hope of winning a monetary reward in varying amounts, in our view of the Maryland Statute, constitutes a bet or wager, regardless of the element of skill.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.