Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 MICH 598 - Neidhold v. Henry

Neidhold v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
July 1948
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Becker v. Welch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The errors in the dates of issuance and return day of the subpoena were mere irregularities. The plaintiff was in no way misled thereby. He was notified by the subpoena that he must enter his appearance within 15 days after its service on him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.