210 Minn. 607
299 N.W 673
Decided July 11, 1941
Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1941-07-11
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1941-07-11
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1967
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 (dissenting).
¶2 I dissent. The only impropriety I see in counsel’s argument was in adding the title of “Doctor” to defendant’s counsel, even though he had displayed the skill and given the opinion of a medical expert. Whatever impropriety occurred in counsel’s argument did not prejudice defendant, for the verdict is not large.