Ewing v. Esterholt’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2011
2 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Krohmer v. Dahl · Kudrna v. Comet Corp. · Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co. · Haynes v. County of Missoula · Salvail v. Great Northern Railway Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“given the nature of respondent's business and the fact that it was a Subchapter S corporation, the trial judge felt the testimony on corporate profits would aid the jury in determining respondent's lost earnings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bova v. Gary
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.