Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Mont. 401 - State v. Magnuson

State v. Magnuson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2008

10 state decisions

40198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wynia v. City of Great Falls

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact that a remedy is provided in the legislation indicates that Congress considered the possibility of a violation and determined the appropriate remedy for that violation. If Congress had intended that suppression and dismissal were the appropriate remedies for a violation of a confidentiality it would have so provided.” State v. Magnuson, 210 Mont. 401, 408 , 682 P.2d 1365 (1984).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[alny person who violates any provision of this section or any regulation issued pursuant to this section shall be fined in accordance with Title 18.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.