State v. . Tate’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1938
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under C. S., 3379, which is not in conflict with the New Hanover County Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, ch. 418, Public Laws 1935, and *Page 715 therefore not repealed thereby ( S. v. Langley , 209 N.C. 178 ), the possession of more than a gallon of spirituous liquor is prima facie evidence of its possession for the purpose of sale. S. v. Hammond , 188 N.C. 602 , 125 S.E. 402 ; S. v. Bush , 177 N.C. 551 , 98 S.E. 281 . Hence, the evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury and to warrant a conviction. S. v. Ellis, ante , 166.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. . Epps
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.