Hill v. . Lindsay’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2005
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Being a nonresident of the State, he may not be permitted to invoke the protection of the statute of limitations, even though he may spend some time each year in the State. Nor could this rule be affected by the fact that he owned property in North Carolina (Grist v. Williams, 111 N.C., 53), or had an agent in this State (Williams v. Building & Loan Assn., 131 N.C., 267; Green v. Ins. Co., 139 N.C., 309 ); Volivar v. Cedar Works, 152 N.C., 34 .” Hill v. Lindsay, 210 N.C. 694, 696 , 188 S.E. 406 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.