¶1 The motion for judgment of nonsuit was properly denied. Appellant complains that the following question propounded by plaintiff’s counsel while selecting the jury was prejudicial: “Is any member of the jury an agent of any insurance company doing a bonding business ?” The court found that the question was asked in good faith. The record states: “To this finding the defendant excepted for that there was no basis in fact for the finding.” There was no motion for a mistrial at the time. The counsel’s question to the jury was less pointed than that in Starr v. Oil Co., 165 N. C., 587. While evidence that a defendant carried indemnity insurance is incompetent (Luttrell v. Hardin, 193 N. C., 266), the propriety of a question propounded in good faith, whether any of the prospective jurors is engaged in the insurance business, ordinarily, must be left to the sound discretion of the trial judge to prevent prejudice to either party. Goss v. Williams, 196 N. C., 213; Fulcher v. Lumber Co.,. 191 N. C., 408; Scott v. Bryan, ante, 478.
¶2 An examination of the other exceptions which appellant noted and brought forward in its appeal fails to show any error warranting us in, disturbing the result.
¶3 No error.