¶1 In the absence of any evidence at the hearing tending to show that the property on which the sheriff has levied is the same property as that described in the chattel mortgage, there was no error in the order denying the motion.
¶2 The motion was not supported by affidavit or other proof that the movant has any interest in or title to the property on which the sheriff had levied. The movant failed to show that she had a right to intervene, and for that reason the order denying her motion is
¶3 Affirmed.