Lawrence v. Matusewski’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Galligan v. Westfield Centre Service, Inc. · Baumann v. Marinaro · New York Ass'n for Blind v. Teeter · 95 N.J. Super. 228 - In Re T. · 205 N.J. Super. 367 - Mazakas v. Wray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, when asked after the passage of 30 days to bypass the binding effect of this statutory arbitration, the trial courts should be guided by the same principles as they would apply in passing upon a motion for relief from an order or a judgment under R. 4:50-1. Of course, the one year limitation of R. 4:50-2 would not apply, since this proceeding has its own internal limitation. But, considering the intention of the arbitration program for finality in the proceeding, the passage of time should be a critical factor in a judge's consideration. [ Mazakas, supra, 205 N.J. Super. at 372 , 500 A. 2d 1085 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“mistake, inadvertence, ... or excusable neglect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.