Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 N.J. Super. 427 - State v. Chung

210 N.J. Super. 427 - State v. Chung’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2013 · most notably State v. Fritz (1987), 133 S. Ct. 1103 - Chaidez v. United States (2013)

54 state decisions — followed in 17 states

1901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · McMann v. Richardson · Jordan v. De George · Ng Fung Ho v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he only reason advanced to justify vacation of the plea [is] defendant's lack of an understanding of the collateral consequences insofar as his immigration status [is] concerned, [s]uch a reason is not adequate since it does not relate to the penal consequences of the plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To be material a mistake must relate to the penal consequences of a plea. A mistake as to a collateral consequence, while it may have a significant effect upon a defendant, is not material.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is not the present responsibility of a New Jersey judge to advise a defendant of federal deportation consequences at the time of the taking of the guilty plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.