Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 ORAPP 409 - State v. Starr

State v. Starr’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “within 20 days of entry of judgment, failing which the motion would be deemed denied). In 2003, the legislature enacted House Bill 2069, amending ORS 136.535 to delete subsections (1) through (3). Or. Laws 2003, ch. 288, § 1. That legislation had the effect of disconnecting motions in arrest of judgment from the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “provision of ORCP 64 F made applicable to a motion for new trial by ORS 136.535. That problem has been remedied. The 2009 legislature amended ORS 136.535 by adding subsection (2), which now provides that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “because no order disposing of the motion has been entered, the judgment in this case is not subject to appeal until an order is entered denying the motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.