Novack v. Novack’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2013
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Company v. Pope · Smith v. Smith · 208 So. 2d 827 - Stone v. Jeffres · Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. v. Watkins · Smith v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(w)hile said section provided that the award of attorney's fees should be made directly to the wife's attorney, it did not alter the essential legal nature of the allowance as one to the wife of suit money to defray her cost for counsel fees . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Wjhere a money judgment has been modified on appeal and the only action necessary in the trial court is compliance with the mandate of the appellate court, interest on the judgment as modified runs from the date of the original judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the fees . . . are attributable to the (party) . . . (and) subject to . . . diminution by reason of countervailing equities of (one party) against (the other).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.