Bramlette v. Hebert’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2015
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink · Payne v. Amos Kent Brick & Lumber Co. · Stamm-Scheele Mfg. Co. v. Young · 171 So. 2d 764 - Jones v. Whittington · Vazquez v. Gairens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The proprietor has a right to cancel at pleasure the bargain he has made, even in case the work has already been commenced, by paying the undertaker for the expense and labor already incurred, and such damages as the nature of the case may require.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Article 2765] is concerned with a situation where the proprietor desires to cancel a construction contract before the work is substantially completed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.