Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 So. 2d 495 - Peer v. Willson

210 So. 2d 495 - Peer v. Willson’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2018

3 state decisions

20196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Watson v. Commissioner · Miller, Et Vir v. Carr · Summerlin v. Orange Shores, Inc. · Adams v. Adams · Griffith v. Hulion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Crops of fruit growing on trees, whether regarded as fructus naturals or fructus industrials, are in general parts of the realty, and, unless reserved, go with the realty in its transfer. But by the acts and intention of an owner of land containing bearing fruit trees the growing fruit may be converted into personalty for purposes of sale.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.