Zapiola v. Kordecki’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Giallanza v. Giallanza · 743 So. 2d 614 - Gustafson v. Mauck · 960 So. 2d 902 - Oettmeier v. Oettmeier · Gill v. Gill · Jones v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ny assault, aggravated assault, battery, aggravated battery, sexual assault, sexual battery, stalking, aggravated stalking, kidnapping, false imprisonment, or any criminal offense resulting in physical injury or death of one family or household member by another family or household member.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“alleged to support the injunction, then not only must the danger feared be imminent but the rationale for the fear must be objectively reasonable as well.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Where 'fear alone is the "reasonable cause”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.