Knight v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 216
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Corning Glass Works v. Brennan · Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Darden · Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc. · Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & Associates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener's understanding and belief in what is said.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.