Austin v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 1994
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Clement Studebaker v. John Perry · Collier v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The commissioner may, if necessary to pay the debts of such state bank, enforce the individual liability of the stockholders.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. Briggs · Austin v. Duffer““The reasons for the rule are no less cogent in one case than in the other. If a present stockholder is compelled to pay more than is needed in settling the debts of the bank, he is entitled, at the close of the administration, to a return of the surplus; and the same' avenue of relief is open to a former stockholder.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pool v. Chapman“■ “At the time of the transfer from Campbell to Bodenheim, the bank owed debts to the amount of $12,000, which remained unpaid when its affairs were taken over by the commissioner on the date above mentioned.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pool v. Chapman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.