Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

210 S.W. 603

Stump v. Riley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1919

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1919-03-13

<p>Appeal and Error &wkey;>755 — Assignments of Error — Insufficiency—Absence of Brief —Evidence.</p> <p>Assignments of error that the judgment is contrary to and not supported by the evidence, and that the court erred in giving judgment for plaintiff as against defendant, for the reason the evidence is insufficient to show plaintiff complied with the contract sued on, without a brief are insufficient to require the Court of Civil Appeals to review them.</p>

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1931

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1919-03-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WALKER, J.

¶1Neither party has briefed this case. It was tried before the court without a jury, and the findings of fact made by the trial judge fully sustain all the allegations in plaintiff’s petition. No attack is made on these findings, nor is any error assigned, other than (1) that the judgment of the court is contrary to and not supported by the evidence, and (2) that the court erred in giving judgment for plaintiff as against the defendant, for the reason that the evidence is insufficient to show that the plaintiff complied with the contract sued upon. These assignments without a brief, are not sufficient to require us'to further inquire into this appeal.

¶2This case is therefore in all respects affirmed.

/210/sw/603 · .json · Public domain