Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 S.W.2d 241 - Howard v. Young

Howard v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2018

6 state decisions

3019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Texas Company v. Davis · Community of Priests of St. Basil v. Byrne · State Mortgage Corp. v. Ludwig · Newbern v. Gould · 3 Tex. Civ. App. 179 - Riggs v. Pope

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts of equity have always exercised jurisdiction over mutual mistakes and granted the relief of reforming written instruments by ascertaining the intent of the parties who executed them and conforming the writing to the real contract which they intended to make. Latham v. Butler, Tex.Civ.App., 17 S.W.2d 1083 . The purpose of doing so is to adjust the instrument to the conditions of fact and make it effective to carry out the true purpose which the parties intended to express.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.