Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 91 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Lancon v. State (2008), Hartsfield v. State (2010)
1 federal appellate · 91 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 180th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Crawford v. Washington · In Re King's Estate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. State“[F]actual-sufficiency review requires [a] reviewing court to afford `due deference' to a jury's determinations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. State“Such a factual sufficiency review requires the reviewing court to consider all of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.