Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 TENN 233 - Combustion Engineering Co. v. Blanks

Combustion Engineering Co. v. Blanks’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1963
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boyd v. Young · Heron v. Girdley · 8 Smith & H. 535 - Sanders v. Blue Ridge Glass Corp. · Storie v. Taylor Supply Co. · London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. Starcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That an expert’s opinion that a certain accident ‘could or might’ produce the injury for which Workmen’s Compensation is sought is competent is so w,pll established by numerous cases as to seem to make it pedantic to cite authorities in support of the admissibility of such evidence. * * * It would be idle to cite other decisions in support of this well established principle of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.