Tucker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 1966
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Miller v. United States · Beadle v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ This Court has long prior to the decision in the Griffin case [Illinois] (1956) [ 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 ] heard criminal appeals on narrative bill of exceptions; in fact as stated in Beadle v. State, 203 Tenn. 97 , 310 S.W.2d 157 , it is the preference of this Court to have such a bill of exceptions. Approximately twenty per cent of criminal appeals in this State are heard on narrative bill of exceptions, and this Court by the acceptance of this method has long afforded all defendants, indigent or not, a full and adequate appellate review. The Supreme Court of the United States has approved a narrative bill of exceptions. Miller v. United States, 317 U.S. 192 , 63 S.Ct. 187 , 87 L.Ed 179.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.