Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 USAPPDC 170 - Control Data Corp. v. Baldrige

Control Data Corp. v. Baldrige’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 1987
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1701 (Affordable Housing for Seniors and Families Act) · 12 U.S.C. § 1864 · 12 U.S.C. § 24 · 22 U.S.C. § 2151 (African Conflict Resolution Act) · 41 U.S.C. § 253 · 5 U.S.C. § 702

Relies on Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Flast v. Cohen · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Sierra Club v. Morton · Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “standard (I/O standard). Input/output channels connect peripheral equipment such as display terminals, keyboards, and printers to the computer mainframe, which performs most of the computer's logical operations. The major computer manufacturers such as appellants and IBM offer their customers both mainframes and peripheral equipment, and it was from these”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “from the case they presented. 85 F.R.D. at 343, J.A. at 163. In both Scanwell and Ballerina Pen, the plaintiffs were disappointed bidders for government contracts. Moreover, in Ballerina Pen the court had actually applied the zone of interests test and found it satisfied, while in Scanwell the court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the allegedly unlawful competition approved by the Comptroller. The Court rejected this theory as a basis for the denial of standing, stating that while the legal interest criterion was pertinent to a determination of the merits, the relevant inquiry for standing purposes was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.