Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 VA 153 - Barrett v. Commonwealth

Barrett v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably Mickens v. Commonwealth (1994), Wilson v. Commonwealth (1995)

42 state decisions

160196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Webb v. Commonwealth · Johnson v. Commonwealth · Ingram v. Commonwealth · Howard v. Commonwealth · Garner v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n attempt to commit a crime is composed of two elements: (1) the intent to commit it; and (2) a direct, ineffectual act done toward its commission.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““All necessary circumstances proved must be consistent with guilt and inconsistent with innocence. It is not sufficient that the evidence create a suspicion of guilt, however strong, or even a probability of guilt, but must exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of guilt. To accomplish that the chain of circumstances must be unbroken and the evidence as a whole must be sufficient to satisfy the guarded judgment that both the corpus delicti and the criminal agency of the accused have been proved to the exclusion of any other reasonable hypothesis and to a moral certainty.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.