Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 VA 33 - Clark v. Grasty

Clark v. Grasty’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2015

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

50196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Willson v. Kable · Nickels' Adm'r v. Horsley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court, under the order of which any (such) fiduciary derives his authority,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whenever for any cause it appears proper.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Generally, the removal of a trustee is within the reasonable discretion of the court. More is required to remove a trustee appointed by the creator of the trust than is required to remove one appointed by the court. In all cases the real guide is whether or not it is best for the trust estate that the trustee be removed. Friction between the trustee and the beneficiary is not in itself sufficient ground for removal. Some beneficial end must be achieved by the removal or it will not be justified. Restatement, Trust, § 107; Bogert, Trusts and Trustees, vol. 3, § 527.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.