Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 VA 514 - Payne v. Rice

Payne v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2018

8 state decisions

4019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warwick v. Warwick · Hamlet v. Hamlet · McElroy v. Rolston · Forrest v. Turner · Hall v. Brigstocke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[no] mere intention or effort to dispose of property by will, however clearly and definitely expressed in writing, is sufficient; such purpose must be executed in the only manner authorized by the statute, that is, the writing itself must be authenticated by the signature of the decedent. It is not sufficient to raise a doubt as to whether his name is intended to authenticate the paper which is propounded as a will, for, to use the explicit language of the statute, it must be signed “in such manner as to make it manifest that the name is intended as his signature,” and unless so signed it is not valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[n]o will shall be valid unless it be ... signed by the testator ... in such manner as to make it manifest that the name is intended as a signature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “testamentary intent [must] be ascertained from the face of the paper, extrinsic evidence being not admissible either to prove or disprove it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.