Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 WIS 327 - State v. Leadbetter

State v. Leadbetter’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2017

4 state decisions

10193319401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Wilder v. Miller · Halbach v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . It was quite evident to the wardens that the defendants were doing something upon the beaver pond and that whatever was being done had required the use of an ice chisel. After the car was extricated the defendants did not come out for an hour and a half and until it was quite dark. Remaining so long in the locality of the beaver pond at that time of year and at that time of day might well seem to the wardens to be inconsistent with any innocent pursuit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he State Conservation Commission and its deputies are given rather broad police powers in the enforcement of the fish and game laws of this state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.