Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Wis. 2d 172 - State v. Grosse

210 Wis. 2d 172 - State v. Grosse’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 81 Wis. 2d 376 - State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social Services · 180 Wis. 2d 502 - State v. Kurzawa · 115 Wis. 2d 243 - State v. Killebrew · 174 Wis. 2d 213 - State v. Thierfelder · 162 Wis. 2d 591 - State v. Fonder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any notion of punishment one might perceive in parole or its revocation is not attributable to the parole itself but to the crime for which the parolee was originally convicted and sentenced. Parole revocation is 'a continuing consequence of the original conviction from which parole was granted,' and cannot form the basis for a claim of double jeopardy . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.