210 Wis. 2d 196 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · Gross v. Hoffman · 150 Wis. 2d 688 - State v. Blalock · 201 Wis. 2d 303 - State v. Bentley · 150 Wis. 2d 94 - State v. Michels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A new factor is a fact that is highly relevant to the imposition of sentence but was not known to the sentencing judge either because it did not exist or because the parties unknowingly overlooked it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“There must also be a nexus between the new factor and the sentence; the new factor must operate to frustrate the sentencing court's original intent when imposing sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.