210 Wis. 2d 347 - State v. Eugenio’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2018
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 208 Wis. 2d 166 - In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. Cook · Dippel v. Sciano · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 116 Wis. 2d 166 - Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co. · United States v. Dring
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to permit the State to introduce other portions of the victim's previous statements to rebut that theory. See id. Thus, we are satisfied that the underpinnings for the doctrine of completeness were established and the trial court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the State to introduce the evidence. C. Insufficient evidence was submitted to permit the jury to evaluate the video to determine whether it was harmful to children. ¶ 26. Booker argues that the evidence adduced at his trial was insufficient, as a matter of law, to prove that the videotape entitled”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[repeating a lie doesn't make it true. You will hear all these different versions because every time she's told someone the story has changed. What didn't change was the attention she got for telling the story, the excitement. . . .You will hear testimony that as a result of this disclosure police officers came to see her, social workers came to see her. She went to court. She met with victim witness people. She met with district attorneys. You will hear that she received a great deal of attention for this disclosure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that opens the trial to all the remaining out-of-court statements. Id. at 361-62 . ¶ 24. Noting that the additional information does not come in automatically, and is admissible only when the party seeking its admission shows that the whole out-of-court statement is necessary to give the fact-finder the full picture of what happened, this court found that introduction was a proper exercise of discretion and observed that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.