210 Wis. 2d 670 - State v. Koopmans’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

cited by 31 later decisions

states following

December 2016

most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably State v. Douangmala (2002), Tweedy v. State (2004)

31 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 172 Wis. 2d 234 - Kelley Co., Inc. v. Marquardt · 201 Wis. 2d 337 - State v. Petty · 192 Wis. 2d 47 - Swatek v. County of Dane · 176 Wis. 2d 1101 - State v. Speer · 154 Wis. 2d 612 - In Interest of CAK

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[a]t all proceedings when the jury is being selected,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Demone Alexander · 229 Wis. 2d 832 - State v. Harris
“[wlhether a defendant may waive the right to be present at sentencing by knowingly[, intelligently] and voluntarily absenting himself or herself'). SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 51. {dissenting). I agree with a number of the majority opinion's conclusions. I dissent, however, because I disagree with the majority's conclusion that the record in the present case demonstrates that Soto, the defendant, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to be present in the same courtroom as the judge under Wis. Stat. § 971.04 (l)(g) when judgment was pronounced. ¶ 52. First, I agree with the majority that under Wis. Stat. § 971.04 (l)(g) Soto had a statutory right to be present in the same courtroom as the judge "at the pronouncement of judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Soto

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.